Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
You're saying "experiments that probably don't have anything to do with their stated objective of relating the ingestion of HFCS to obesity and blaming it on the fructose." "Probably" means you can't say conclusively
But that's exactly how the Scientific Method works, sheila. It's to do with the confluence of evidence, general plausibility, alternative explanations, challenges to dogma etc. etc....

I well understand the scientific method.

But that's not what I'm talking about, my dear. I'm talking about OleDoc having arrived at conclusions about the authors' experiments based on having read a summary--the abstract--that does not contain the information he needs for drawing those conclusions.

And as for "alternative explanations and challenges to dogma" -- makes me smile to see you including that in your (irrelevant) invocation of the scientific method, seeing as how you personally have such a tough time with such alternatives and challenges, no matter how well grounded they are.

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.