No. of Recommendations: 0
Zee,

Thanks for doing this. You indicate that your first test started in 1999. Did you mean 1989?

I don't believe there is evidence here to suggest that any other value is superior to the default value of 1.00. It is interesting that in terms of resulting Sharpe, using Sharpe/GSD (X = 1) instead of Sharpe (X = 0) seems to help when there are SIPRO screens in the mix, but has little impact on resulting Sharpe when limited to Valueline screens. It does result is a lower GSD though which is not a bad thing.

My vote would be to stick with Sharpe/GSD (X=1). I'm not sure how much better it is as a predictor over Sharpe alone, but your results would suggest that it is not any worse.

StevnFool
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement