No. of Recommendations: 3
- If Clinton wants to do something to help retirement, she should put her efforts into fixing the existing systems first, before starting a new entitlement program.

- I would be surprised if the cost of this program could be covered by the estate tax of the high rollers as was suggested. First, this is not a given to get through Congress and second I would be almost certain it would create a new bureaucracy/government agency that would have to be staffed/funded by ???? Surprise anyone ?

- When the previous proposals were made for privatization of SS, it was not a scheme to allow people to lose all of their savings; that's a left wing talking point. The suggestion was to allow the OPTION of using a percentage (e.g. 2%) for individual investment. It was not madatory and it was not the entire portion from the employee or employer. Most folks never got this since the media blitz was always how you could lose your shirt.

- This is also just another tentacle that some would like to have so there is one more part of your life under government control.
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.