The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Learning to Invest / Reading Financial Statements

URL:  https://boards.fool.com/dear-billscally-basically-book-value-assets--12696116.aspx

Subject:  Re: negative equity Date:  6/7/2000  12:02 PM
Author:  jmls Number:  1120 of 3984

Dear billscally,

Basically book value = assets - liabilities, so as you say, in principle there is nothing wrong with a negative book value ("shareholder's deficit").

In principle "book value" would be the value of a company to shareholders if all liabilities were paid off. The "in principle" comes because it probably isn't so; equipment and inventory likely would have to be sold for less than the value on the books, other things may sell for more (e.g. sometimes real estate, purchased companies).

Ben Graham says that book value is more accurately a measure of the money "put into" a company (shareholder's equity = money from issued stock + paid in capital + retained earnings - treasury stock, possible I'm missing one or two things but these are the main ones). One can make this number negative by paying out quite a bit of equity (e.g. special dividend) or buying back a bunch of shares. The times I have seen it has been the latter (take on debt to buy back a lot of shares).

I see this in LBOed companies sometimes...

Did I answer your question?

Lleweilun Smith
Copyright 1996-2019 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us