The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Politics & Current Events / Retire Early CampFIRE


Subject:  Re: Predictive Power Date:  12/29/2002  12:41 PM
Author:  galagan Number:  88028 of 888931

Catherine: hocus seems to want everyone to pitch in and analyze "methodologies" and "data" to refute and/or replace The Study.

Hocus: You have misunderstood something somewhere along the line, Catherine. I do not want this.


You've said that intercst's study is flawed. You've invited people to discuss reasons why. But you don't want to find a better study?

Hocus, I'd request that you clarify exactly what you're trying to do here, because if you're not trying to find better analysis than what intercst has done, why would you post 40+ times in the last day?

Copyright 1996-2022 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us