The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing

URL:  https://boards.fool.com/scott-burns-discusses-this-issue-here-21972756.aspx

Subject:  Re: Do you have a rational home equity policy? Date:  1/27/2005  2:41 AM
Author:  OldOne Number:  44217 of 91699

Scott Burns discusses this issue here: http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/bus/scottburns/columns/archives/1999/990711SU.htm

We are intending to move when we retire, so resetting the mortgage basis is not an issue with us.

There are a few things Scott did not analyze as thoroughly as I would have liked.

One is liquidity--having a lot of your assets tied up in a not-very-liquid investment is definitely a drawback. OTOH, if you have enough liquid assets to cover any conceivable emergency, a paid-up primary residence may be a very good thing.

Another is the tax situation. If your income in retirement is high enough to put you into the AMT range, transferring assets into a fully-paid house has some interesting consequences. You get the occupancy return, but since no money actually changes hands it is a completely non-taxable return. This is a nice example of a tax-free return on investment.

What you lose is the leveraged appreciation of the real estate.

I expect that it will take more than a few hours with a spreadsheet and a tax advisor to get this exactly right, but if you have the assets, you get more than one chance at it. For instance, move into a new primary residence with about a 50% down payment and a no-prepayment penalty loan. You can transfer as much money as you want into the primary residence at any time.
Copyright 1996-2019 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us