|
The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
|
Financial Planning / Revocable Trusts |
||
|
URL:
https://boards.fool.com/im-thinking-the-best-approach-is-not-to-name-the-22805600.aspx
|
||
| Subject: Re: RLT as 2nd Benificiary for Funds | Date: 7/27/2005 1:01 PM | |
| Author: foolazis | Number: 82 of 87 | |
|
I'm thinking the best approach is not to name the trust as beneficiary for my IRAs. Any thoughts ? I concur with this. If you want to stretch your IRA payouts, then do not name the trust as a direct beneficiary. I have named primary beneficiaries and the trust is named as a contingent beneficiary. foolazis |
||
| Copyright 1996-2019 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us | ||