The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Religion & Culture / Creation vs. Evolution

URL:  https://boards.fool.com/the-literature-has-no-detailed-rigorous-25740238.aspx

Subject:  Re: Discover magazine review of Behe Date:  7/31/2007  9:05 AM
Author:  Kazim Number:  10352 of 27171

the literature has no detailed rigorous explanations for how complex biochemical systems could arise by a random mutation and natural selection

Additionally:

Must we go through all this again? Behe's argument is nothing more than moving the goalposts. His book claims that it is actually impossible to produce an evolutionary pathway to the biochemical systems he highlights. These papers answer that question, whereupon Behe complains that they don't prove that they provide THE conclusive, historical path that was actually followed. This is a total red herring: Behe's claim of an unproved designer relies on the belief that no possible pathway exists. And that one is simply wrong.
Copyright 1996-2022 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us