The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Bonds & Fixed Income Investments


Subject:  Why not farmland? Date:  1/1/2010  3:22 PM
Author:  LONGREITS Number:  29637 of 37023

Farmland provides both a cash yield and capital appreciation. It's a play on inflation and a rise in commodity prices, namely wheat, soybeans and corn. It's also often a family-run business, where families can control tens of thousands of acres. Why doesn't Buffett buy a few hundred thousand acres, or a million acres, across the country to further diversify Berkshire's earnings base? I believe it provides exposure and a hedge that, to a degree, is not provided by the other subs. Moreover, I feel many families would be more than happy to put their land in Berkshire's hands.

Perhaps the argument goes that it wouldn't "move the needle" and even a million acres at 3,000 per acre is only 3 billion. Thoughts?
Copyright 1996-2021 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us