|
The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
|
Investing Education / Terms, Definitions, & Jargon |
||
|
URL:
https://boards.fool.com/thought-id-throw-out-an-impairment-of-a-different-28961886.aspx
|
||
| Subject: Re: Help me understand Impairment in layman's te | Date: 12/15/2010 11:50 PM | |
| Author: TMFSandman | Number: 2137 of 2244 | |
|
Thought I'd throw out an impairment of a different flavor. In 2009 the price of oil and natural gas cratered. GAAP accounting standards require exploration and production (e&p) companies to write down oil and gas reserves that are no longer economically worth drilling for at the current price. This rule resulted in some pretty huge non-cash impairment charges to earnings in 2009. Take a look at the income statement on page 80 of Chesapeake Energy's 10-K: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/895126/00011931251004... You'll see under Operating Costs an $11.1 billion charge for "Impairment of natural gas and oil properties and other assets." Go one page further down to the cash flow statement and you'll see this non-cash charge added back in. So if you look at pretty much any e&p's financial statements for 2009 you not only get reduced income due to the lower sales price of oil and natural gas, but you get a second whammy from the non-cash impairment charge. Though this impairment is GAAP-approved I wouldn't put it in the same category as the permanent asset impairment example I made up about the pharma company. That is, unless you believed that the price of oil was going to stay at $25.00 a barrel and natural gas at $2.00/mcf. Mike |
||
| Copyright 1996-2022 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us | ||