The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing


Subject:  Re: Roth 401k vs. traditional 401k Date:  3/19/2014  6:51 PM
Author:  MurrayS Number:  74558 of 102480

I agree with most of the posts here; at a 15% marginal tax rate or lower, a Roth is a no brainer. At 25% and higher, it becomes murkier. Consider that a married couple making $100k would pay under $12k in taxes or less than 12%. Even if you made $20k in SS and the $12k in taxes came out of the remaining $80k, you'd be paying 12/80 or 15%. That's still a heck of a lot less than 25% or the 30%+ that I'm paying.

I disagree that paying no taxes in retirement would be a good thing...I consider it a lost opportunity since it likely means higher tax rates were paid earlier in life which could have been invested to yield more income in retirement. Having a mix so you can control your taxes is ideal.

If RMDs happen to push my withdrawals into rates higher than I'm paying now, I'll know my retirement is financially set.
Copyright 1996-2021 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us