The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Mechanical Investing

URL:  https://boards.fool.com/i-have-to-admin-i-haven39t-been-keeping-track-34131937.aspx

Subject:  Re: Up 5% MI Screen Date:  2/11/2019  1:21 PM
Author:  gritton Number:  273426 of 275117

I have to admin I haven't been keeping track of Robbie's work in correcting SI's errors. But the sentence "the SIP version of Cash Flow is used in the Rankings" suggests backtest.org should still match the rankings. Yet it doesn't. Looking at Dec 1, I seem to be including a lot of stocks that the rankings don't - I had 23 pass the cutoffs while there were 7 on the rankings list.

Looking at the first stock I passed that the rankings didn't, FOXF:
price     63.71
avd_10d 385
eps_eq1 0.465
epspm_eq1 0.44
epsum_eq0 9
epsdm_eq0 0
pcfps 19.8
prchg_26w 55.39

Those numbers all point to passing the rules of the screen. So are we using different rules, or different values?

- Jamie
Copyright 1996-2019 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us