The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
Investment Analysis Clubs / Saul’s Investing Discussions |
||
URL:
https://boards.fool.com/ranking-pinterest-pins-on-my-checklist-34188364.aspx
|
||
Subject: Ranking Pinterest (PINS) On My Checklist | Date: 4/21/2019 7:23 AM | |
Author: TMFTypeoh | Number: 54800 of 62167 | |
Hey Fools, Here's my attempt to rank PINS
For perspective, the highest score possible is 100, and the lowest score possible is -44. Pinterest's 79 is great. This number could go even higher if the company regularly beats expectations and thumps the S&P over time. Pinterest's stock is expensive, and it came public at a FLAT valuation to what it achieved a few years ago in the public market. That's something to watch. Still, there's no doubt in my mind that this is a high-quality business. Brian ******* FAQ: Is there a spreadsheet that has all of your data? Yes, but I do not want to make it publicly available. I will post on a company by company basis to the boards. Feel free to follow me if you want to see my most recent rankings. What companies have received the highest scores so far?Alphabet (88), Paycom Software (86), MercadoLibre (85), Amazon (85), HubSpot (85), Adobe (84), Paylocity (84), and Q2 Holdings (84) What data do you have to show that this methodology works? Very little. I'm currently thinking through ways to measure its long-term effectiveness, but my gut feeling tells me that it will help me pick better stocks. What about valuation? This data is only designed to help me determine business quality, which is far more important than valuation. Whenever I personally make buy/hold/sell decisions, I always consider valuation too, but I think it is small "f" foolish to not buy a truly great business just because of valuation concerns. You can read more about the checklist here: http://boards.fool.com/brian39s-quality-checklist-version-20... ***************************************************************************************** |
||
Copyright 1996-2019 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us |