The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
Investing Strategies / Retirement Investing |
||
URL:
https://boards.fool.com/i-was-surprised-that-it-did-not-ask-about-the-35036022.aspx
|
||
Subject: Re: Calculation of Social Security | Date: 1/25/2022 12:00 AM | |
Author: intercst | Number: 106020 of 107835 | |
I was surprised that it did not ask about the longevity of your parents. I have consistently heard that is a factor. That was dispelled back in 2018 by a "big data" analysis of the Ancestry.com database performed by the geniuses at Google. A Longer Life May Not Be in Your Genes https://www.livescience.com/64018-longevity-genetic-question... Long life spans tend to run in families, a phenomenon that's often attributed to people's genes. But now, a large new study of data from the genealogy website Ancestry reveals that genetics may play less of a role in life span than previously thought. The reason? Previous studies failed to take into account a quirk of human relationships: that people tend select romantic partners with similar traits to their own. The findings mean that previous studies may have substantially overestimated the heritability of life span, the researchers said. </snip> Diet, exercise, and lifestyle choices are much more important than your genes. intercst |
||
Copyright 1996-2022 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us |