No. of Recommendations: 0
A few years ago I read an article (I can't remember where) about the demographics of the home supply (the actual buildings, not the homebuyers). As I remember it there was curve very similar to the baby boom of homes built after world two. There is a major problem with this in that as houses age they keep getting more expensive to maintain until there are no longer economically viable to maintain and will generally either be torn down or abandoned. Some houses will be exceptions to this like nice upscale houses in a good areas(like the ones on “This Old House” on PBS) but your typical suburban tract house will be past it economically useful life in something like 60 to 80 years (as I remember the artical). If anyone knows more about this it I would welcome more information.

I would be very cautious about buying something like a 50-year-old tract home to rent because it may be nearing the end of its useful life and even if the housing market in general continues to appreciate, that specific house may loose value becasue of its age.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.