Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 1
During the impeachment, there was one anonymous whistle blower with a reported second hand account (not direct account) who did not testify and did not sign an affidavit under perjury.

The Democrats and media were pronouncing this whistle blower as a patriot, a hero, honorable person who should be believed and protected, nothing but 24/7 coverage and praise.

Fast forward to the election, there are multiple hundreds (not just one) of private citizen whistle blowers who have willingly signed an affidavit under perjury, who are coming forward publicly, not hiding, not staying anonymous, testifying, with first hand direct accounts of voter fraud and irregularities.

The Democrats and media either denounce them or do not cover them in the news.

This is the political double standard in action, a partnership between the media and liberal/progressive politicians/movement.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
This is the political double standard in action, a partnership between the media and liberal/progressive politicians/movement.

If the right didn't have double standards, they would not have any standards at all.

Fast forward to the election, there are multiple hundreds (not just one) of private citizen whistle blowers who have willingly signed an affidavit under perjury, who are coming forward publicly, not hiding, not staying anonymous, testifying, with first hand direct accounts of voter fraud and irregularities.

They lie--a lot. The *facts* of what happened contradict their *opinions* of what happened. So, should they be prosecuted--or not? Let's see how many of these "whistleblowers" get JAIL TIME for *perjury*.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"They lie--a lot. The *facts* of what happened contradict their *opinions* of what happened. So, should they be prosecuted--or not? Let's see how many of these "whistleblowers" get JAIL TIME for *perjury*."

I could see a few operatives rolling the dice, however multiple hundreds of people signing their name to perjury penalty for lying? You really believe they are lying? Truth, fact, logic, reality all support the claim these people are telling true stories of their accounts, yet you claim here today these people are liars?

Be real, please, for once.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 25
Fast forward to the election, there are multiple hundreds (not just one) of private citizen whistle blowers who have willingly signed an affidavit under perjury, who are coming forward publicly, not hiding, not staying anonymous, testifying, with first hand direct accounts of voter fraud and irregularities.

Those affidavits were not primarily first hand accounts at all. And those that have spoken of first hand experience often identified actions they THOUGHT were illegal, that were not, in fact, illegal.

And that’s why those affidavits carried absolutely no weight in the three dozen court cases in which the judges (including some appointed by Trump) dismissed the cases for lack of evidence.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 9
The so-called "whistle-blowers" don't understand how elections work--or pandemics.

They "blew the whistle" on having to stand at least 6' away from election workers. Frankly, had I been one of those workers, I would've stomped out shouting if anyone stood closer than 10' from me or let their mask slip below their nose. Or possibly slugged them for endangering me.

They don't understand the nuts & bolts of how it all works either. For example, they wanted to personally verify signatures after it was already done, but once signatures are verified, they are separated from their enclosed ballots to maintain a secret ballot. Doofuses.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Truth, fact, logic, reality all support the claim these people are telling true stories of their accounts, yet you claim here today these people are liars?

Yes, they are liars (per you). Belief/opinion is not necessarily the truth. If there was validity to their allegations (sworn statements--per YOU), then that could be verified independently--particularly in many red states. Yet, funny enough, virtually NONE of their SWORN STATEMENTS turned out to be true. Are you now going to blame the right wing media for lying to the public--AGAIN? Or what?

The closest we came to seeing "election fraud" was when Spankee lost 20k votes in PA in 30 seconds. That was when the "fake ballots"--all for Spankee--were thrown out and deducted from Spankee's total. It was posted here on TMF by right wing believers, so you can't claim it did NOT happen. Of course, Spankee could NOT claim those votes in court. To do so would incriminate him and other high-level members of the right--who tried to get them accepted--in federal vote-rigging and ballot-fraud. They would ALL be run out of town on rails AFTER they were tarred and feathered.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 10
Fast forward to the election, there are multiple hundreds (not just one) of private citizen whistle blowers who have willingly signed an affidavit under perjury, who are coming forward publicly, not hiding, not staying anonymous, testifying, with first hand direct accounts of voter fraud and irregularities.

Once again, a very simple question which I’m sure you will ignore (or change the subject):

How many of theses “multiple hundreds” of affidavits did the Trump attorneys present in a court of law (where they could be cross examined) in one of their dozens of election lawsuits?

Hint: Zero.

Aren’t you curious why?

Was Trump too incompetent to hire competent lawyers?

Did they know these affidavits were worthless?

We’re the lawyers afraid of disbarment if they submitted false affidavits in court?

All of the above?



The only election fraud happening is Trump stealing money from his ignorant and gullible supporters to continue the “good” fight. A good con artist like Trump knows an easy mark when he sees one.

Awaiting your lucid response but having a love of life, not holding my breath.

The truth shall set you free and the truth is Trump lost the election fair and square. Stop being an easy mark (and a sore loser).

AW
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
How many of theses “multiple hundreds” of affidavits did the Trump attorneys present in a court of law (where they could be cross examined) in one of their dozens of election lawsuits?

Hint: Zero.


Oops, my bad! They DID submit affidavits.

Where they were quickly shot down by judges (including Republican judges) because they were riddled with mistakes, inaccurate, or in one case, just hearsay.


My apologies.

AW
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 8
Fast forward to the election, there are multiple hundreds (not just one) of private citizen whistle blowers who have willingly signed an affidavit under perjury, who are coming forward publicly, not hiding, not staying anonymous, testifying, with first hand direct accounts of voter fraud and irregularities.

Please provide a link to an affidavit of a witness testifying to first hand direct observation of any voter committing fraud.

Albaby
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Hilary Clinton had it exactly right 4 years ago, these right-wing "Karen " and "Kevin's" are nothing but deplorable's...

Just as stupid as members of the Trump Grifter Family!!!
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
How many of theses “multiple hundreds” of affidavits did the Trump attorneys present in a court of law (where they could be cross examined) in one of their dozens of election lawsuits?
Hint: Zero.

Not quite the right legalese.
Try "A non positive or negative integer"
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
A political double standard

Syzygy: How cute, your arguing that there is a double standard... when it suits your purpose.
To quote your own words "It's a big nothing burger"... don't choke on it
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Doofuses.

You are being too kind to these willfully ignorant "Trump first and always" traitors to our country.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
"with first hand direct accounts of voter fraud and irregularities."


When Rudy was given the opportunity to claim fraud, he backed off quickly. The accounts you talk of have been dismissed by courts and republican judges, not democrat politicians. You also have the man who made the DOJ into Trump's personal team of lawyers, denying that election fraud has taken place and now he's being called a RINO and part of the Deep State. Face it, anything less than Trump examining each and every vote himself will be seen as stealing the election. Have you given any thought to what would happen to this country if Trump actually got a republican legislature to overrule the voters and declare Trump the winner?
Print the post Back To Top