No. of Recommendations: 6

<<<Here are the numbers. It currently costs 27k to purchase 1 year. She plans to retire in 7-8 years.
The purchase price is based on current salary, 75K, and the pension benefit is based on highest average salary(HAS). She recently had raise/promo to 115k which should grow modestly over the next 7-8 years by 1-3% per year.

By purchasing years, she increases her pension benefit payout percent as follows
no purchase, pension = 27.5% of HAS
purchase 3 yrs, pension = 37.8% of HAS
purchase 6 yrs, pension = 50% of HAS>>>

"Okay, a quick IRR (internal rate of return), shows that the added income stream produces a 14-15% return on your initial investment. This was assuming she'd get an additional 10.3% with 3 years, 22.5% with 6 years, retirement in 7 years and payout for 20 years. It's also based on a HAS of $115,000, so the return will be greater assuming her pay increases.

I think a guaranteed 14% return is worth it. I'd go over the numbers with her and encourage her to stay long enough so her HAS is over $115,000. At some point, the retirement benefit plays a bigger role in career decisions and hopefully she'll stay long enough to lock in a higher HAS."

I do not recall whether there are survivor benefits to you after she dies, but the IRR calculation assumed that you wife would live for another 27 years.

According to the SS Actuarial Life Table:

Average life epxectancy for a is 26.87 years, less than the 27 years assumed, and IIRC the table correctly, means that there is roughly 50% chance that se will not live than long.

You know her health, and her gene pool, but I am certain that the IRR would decrease if the assumption was "retirement in 7 years and payout for 10 years".

Unless you get 100% survivor benefits, without a reduction in her initial payment amount, her death would end the income stream and leave you without the assets used to purchase the years.

In addition, unless you get 100% survivor benefits were without a reduction in her initial payment amount, it is possible that the IRR calculations above are off. And I even never seen a pension that pays 100% survivor benefits without reducing the amount that would be paid if paid only to the pensioner for his or her life.

Regards, JAFO
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.