Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 7
Amazing
As of 9 AM today if you Use the search feature on cnn.com for “Bobulinski” you get “nothing found”
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 15
Amazing
As of 9 AM today if you Use the search feature on cnn.com for “Bobulinski” you get “nothing found” - isawbones


---------------

Interesting. I just searched CNN for "journalistic integrity" and also got the nothing found here message.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Well you gotta figure that that bunch of commies is gonna bury anything that is gonna make their man Sleepy Joe look bad.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 8
Well you gotta figure that that bunch of commies is gonna bury anything that is gonna make their man Sleepy Joe look bad.

This should surprise no one. CNN is there as part of Biden's election committee. Their job is to broadcast ONLY that information that supports JB and that information that is anti-Trump.

BruceM
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
The NY Times has a piece talking about how Bobulinski was involved with an effort to pitch the story to the Wall Street Journal before the NY Post story came out, or Schiff's comments about Russian disinformation. However, on Tucker's show, Bobulinski said the only reason he was coming forward was because of Schiff's comments.

Sounds like he is lying if the reporting is accurate, and thus why Fox was so eager to run with it.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 4
The NY Times has a piece talking about how Bobulinski was involved with an effort to pitch the story to the Wall Street Journal before the NY Post story came out, or Schiff's comments about Russian disinformation.

Bobulinski approached the WSJ not over Adam Schiff's comments, but his findings that the methods being used by H. Biden were suspicious and worthy of investigation a true journalist should do. On Oct 16, Schiff made his comments about the e-mails and any attempt to provide information on the J. Biden involvement as a Russian Disinformation campaign, basically incriminating anyone who was proffering information on it, as Bobulinski had to the WSJ. Hence, Bobulinski saw himself incriminated and so told Walker on 20 Oct to get Schiff to retract it or he'd do his own press release to make available all information available to him (including his phones) to clear his name. Schiff didn't so Bobulinski did.

The NYT piece is cleverly worded but misleading. Their main point is the e-mails could not PROVE J. Biden set up the deal between H. Biden and team and CETA or any other Chinese organization. But nobody is saying the e-mails PROVE anything....its just a NYT strawman. The WSJ's position of 'no role for J. Biden' says that couldn't find a smoking gun...which I think Trump was hoping for just prior to the Oct 22 debate. But this doesn't mean J. Biden was not involved with his sons or others relationship with foreign business relations.

Personally, I doubt seriously J. Biden had a direct hand in setting up anything for his sons while VP. He's been around too long and knows as well as anyone the consequences of doing that, particularly if he did it while VP. But he clearly did talk with Hunter about his business dealings on more than a couple of occasions and he may well have taken remuneration as the one text message suggests in 2017. As long as these happened in 2017 or later, I don't see any laws violated. But to the voter, this could be a major event, legal or not.

BruceM
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Bobulinski approached the WSJ not over Adam Schiff's comments, but his findings that the methods being used by H. Biden were suspicious and worthy of investigation a true journalist should do. On Oct 16, Schiff made his comments about the e-mails and any attempt to provide information on the J. Biden involvement as a Russian Disinformation campaign, basically incriminating anyone who was proffering information on it, as Bobulinski had to the WSJ. Hence, Bobulinski saw himself incriminated and so told Walker on 20 Oct to get Schiff to retract it or he'd do his own press release to make available all information available to him (including his phones) to clear his name. Schiff didn't so Bobulinski did.

Fair enough; I had interpreted his comments about the only reason he was coming forward due to Schiff to be more broad (e.g. providing any corroboration or public comments at all) vs. just the interview with Tucker.

With that said, if he did find H. Biden's methods to be suspicious and worthy of investigation, I wonder why he did not come forward back when this was happening rather than waiting for October. It would also be nice to learn if the laptops truly belonged to H. Biden, or if that was a cover for how the emails and texts (which I do agree appear to be legitimate yet not evidence of anything illegal) were discovered.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
"It would also be nice to learn if the laptops truly belonged to H. Biden, or if that was a cover for how the emails and texts (which I do agree appear to be legitimate yet not evidence of anything illegal) were discovered."

You realize that Hunter's signature (confirmed) was on the slip when the computer was dropped off,& Hunter's lawyer called the shop to regain possession of the computer.

It's Hunter's,no question,& not someone named Boris
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 7
It would also be nice to learn if the laptops truly belonged to H. Biden, or if that was a cover for how the emails and texts (which I do agree appear to be legitimate yet not evidence of anything illegal) were discovered

Ok, fair question. But if this were created by some malicious entity (e.g. Russians) and it we're totally false, wouldn't J. Biden, H. Biden and perhaps Wallace be screaming this falsehood into any microphone put in front of them? But what do we hear from the Bidens and their team members? NOTHING, and it is deafening!

BruceM
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
I just did a google and a duckduckgo search on "did the 5 apologize to newt" Amazing difference in search results.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
I just did a google and a duckduckgo search on "did the 5 apologize to newt" Amazing difference in search results.

True, however make sure you are not logged into ANYTHING on the device you searched on. That will skew the results as it will try and make it customized.

Want to see some fun results? Use a VPN or web browser plugin VPN and see the results when the searching engine things your in Germany or elsewhere :)
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Ok, fair question. But if this were created by some malicious entity (e.g. Russians) and it we're totally false, wouldn't J. Biden, H. Biden and perhaps Wallace be screaming this falsehood into any microphone put in front of them? But what do we hear from the Bidens and their team members? NOTHING, and it is deafening!

Possibly, however in the case of disinformation (not saying this is as there are still too many open questions) there is a good mix of factual information along with fabricated information--which is what makes it believable. To agree or disagree with any of the facts publicly then leads people to label all of it as truth or that the person is lying about the parts that are not true.

As an example, if there is a sex video on there, that might be legitimate but doesn't prove it is H. Biden's laptop. If they say the laptop is fake, people think he is lying because it has a real video on it.
Print the post Back To Top