Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 2
Analysts create 1 year price targets to determine these ratings. Lets say an analyst sees CNXS at $12 and based on research sets target at $18. At this point the stock would be a buy. Stock then runs up to $18 in a couple months. The analyst has to do something; saying a stock is a buy when it hits its price target prematurely is not an appropriate investing call. So either they have to rasie their price target or change their stock rating (or both). If raising the price target is not warranted then the rating will be cut.

The problem is that when you consider short term volatility taking a snapshot of the stock and base a rating on the price/value at that time doesn't mean it applies a week later. Also, analysts have outlooks that most people don't have; I'd say most people buying stocks have generally very short or very long outlooks.

I also think this kind of activity makes more sense on a stock like KO, WMT, etc, where IV calculations come with far more certainly. Even "conservative" valuations for CNXS can range from $10 to $20 because they have been less than perfect from an execution standpoint for years. Mix that with stock volatility, and you think analyst ratings are very meaningful (if they ever were) after even 1 week?
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.