No. of Recommendations: 1
Anthony and I are taking the null hypothesis (i.e. 'no free will'). The burden should be on those taking the opposing view. Specifically, you are proposing there is something beyond causation (i.e. the string of events throughout time that produced a given DNA (nature) and stuff that happens to us (nurture - STHTU). As I recall you further posit that this something is innate to the universe, and you label it "conscious". All without any evidence more compelling than "I feel the spirit of the lord" (which neither you nor I would accept either). Personal experience is not evidence of anything other than one's personal experience, and said experience often does not match up with objective reality.

Most recently you bring up quantum effects in biology without explaining how those could be related to free will (an especially tough challenge given that QM is probabilistic, not "willed" in any way that I'm aware of).
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.