Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 21
As BAC gets hit with credit downgrades it has to post more collateral as a derivatives counterparty. The advantage of moving the derivatives from un-FDIC-insured Merrill to the FDIC-insured retail bank Bank of America N.A. is that BAC the holding company won't have to post as much collateral. In a worst case scenario all of BAC's equity could go toward paying off their derivative liabilities and then the FDIC would cover deposits. JP Morgan already does this, using their retail bank as their derivatives counterparty.

You could read into this that Merrill's derivatives liabilties are headed for trouble but you could also look at it as BAC looking to save money by adopting a practice that the best of breed in the industry have already been doing for years.


Felix Salmon wrote a pretty food piece on this at seekingalpha:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/300999-bofa-puts-taxpayers-o...

Mike
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.