Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
As KAT points out, both the original post and the table are both correct. Check out the table again with this new found understanding. It should help.

Both Kat's post and yours are totally unresponsive. From the level of detail I left in my post it should be obvious that I looked at both sources prior to asking the question. Telling me to go back and re-read them is a useless response.

If you didn't want to answer the question, you should have just said so or ignored it.

And, if you have any additional questions, or need clarification, you can always come back here and ask.

I did ask. I did not get a responsive answer.

Forget about it. I'll go ask on misc.taxes. I'm more likely to get a response there.

TJRC
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.