No. of Recommendations: 1
As you already know, Romney is calling for a 20% tax rate cut.

Right. That's what I meant.

If the "tax cut" is a tax rate cut, then the resulting revenue could be lower, higher, or the same.

Well, he's saying that combined with closing loopholes that it's revenue neutral, which to me means it's not really a tax cut. Or rather, it'd be a tax cut for some, but an offsetting increase for others.

I see two problems with this:

1. There aren't enough "loopholes" to close to offset a 20% rate cut.
2. Since it's revenue neutral, some will pay more, others less -- so who is it that pays more versus less. (The Center for Tax Policy analysis suggests middle class households will pay an average of $2,000 more.)

Aren't you tired of the word games yet?

Actually, I'm sick of them. I don't think it's cricket to call a $2,000 tax increase on middle class households a "tax cut" just because the marginal rates are reduced 20%.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.