Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
In looking through the Financial Glossary I found this definition for beta:

"A measure of the relative volatility of a stock or other security as compared to the volatility of the entire market (usually measured by the S&P 500 index). A beta above 1.0 shows greater volatility than the overall market, and a beta below 1.0 is less volatile."

Unfortunately, the last sentence isn't true. Because beta combines both the relative volatility of a security's returns and the correlation of its returns with the market's returns, beta, by itself, only sets a lower bound on a security's volatility of returns. A security with a beta greater than 1.0 is certainly more volatile than the market (though more information is needed to determine how much more), but a security with a beta less than 1.0 is not necessarily less volatile than the market. For example, stock XYZ could have a standard deviation of returns of 100% compared to the market's 10% (or ten times the market's volatility), but if the correlation of returns of XYZ's stock and the market is 0.05, then XYZ's stock will have a beta of 0.5. That beta describes the relative volatility of returns of an asset is a common misconception.

So, how does one correct the definition in the glossary?
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.