Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
173 posts into this new board and the anti-religionist arch-bigot, who calls himself Gooh, has arrived. We know him from other locations where he has set forth such scurrility as a claim that Bill Clinton saved America from the Christians. This time, the surrogate he links in expands the negative, anti-religionist smear to all organized religion. From my point of view, the linked essay would normally be something to be observed, disagreed with, and let pass, with wonderment at who in the world is running the Snohomish, WA school system (or whatever authority purportedly awarded that piece the essay prize). The basis for the wonderment would be, what would that board of judges have done with an equally well-written piece that criticized with equal effectiveness such concepts as affirmative action or abortion-on-demand or gay rights? I suspect that such essays would never have seen the light of day and that their authors may, indeed, have found themselves suspended from school. But here we have powerful evidence that one target of politically-correct bigotry is still fair game in modern America--"organized religion".Aside from the previous point about the "wonderment," something else is quite disturbing about post no. 173. That is that it brings that piece expressly to the attention of someone who claims to be a 17 year-old. I find it just about as offensive for someone to hustle a 17 year-old with anti-religionist propaganda as it would be to furnish them pornography or drugs. If anyone reading this disagrees, I'm sure you will speak up and defend the practice.Having said that, I will also say for the record that I have serious doubts that Ace1/*/*/Ace2 is actually what he/she claims to be. I have read all his/her posts here and on the GTW board--and have received (but not answered) some private e-mails from that writer. And while I did participate in a bit of (harmless, I think) fun when the bizarre posts started coming in from this writer, my sense is that something is, indeed, not what it is represented to be. There are numerous examples, but post no. 174 here strikes me as just not the work of a 17 year-old, especially not one so green as to have been running around just the other day soliciting ideas for the subject of his two-star post, or to undergo four name transplants in a month. /s/ S.T.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |