Skip to main content
Update
Non-financial boards have been closed.

Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.

Fool.com | The Motley Fool Community
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 78
As usual, Bush decides that science is "at odds" with his agenda. And he'll prove it too, by not letting anyone get access to information...

http://www.muckraked.com/wordpress/2006/02/28/epa-shutting-off-access-to-info/

Tucked away in the Bush administration's recent budget is a proposal that has alarmed scientists and environmentalists. Under the plan, the Environmental Protection Agency will shut down its network of libraries serving the public and its own staff scientists.

In addition, the agency will discontinue its electronic catalog, “which tracks tens of thousands of unique documents and research studies that are available nowhere else,” ...


Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Bushs War on the Environment is the only war I believe he is unequivocally winning.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Bushs War on the Environment is the only war I believe he is unequivocally winning.

Nah. He's also winning his wars on: Truth. Justice. The American Way. Efficient Government. Responsible public finances. Stewardship of the peoples' resources and life support systems.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 19
Tucked away in the Bush administration's recent budget is a proposal that has alarmed scientists and environmentalists. Under the plan, the Environmental Protection Agency will shut down its network of libraries serving the public and its own staff scientists.

In addition, the agency will discontinue its electronic catalog, “which tracks tens of thousands of unique documents and research studies that are available nowhere else,” ...


This is the Bush administration at their sleazy best ... they excel at ruling by decree. Well, not exactly by decree, because he's not exactly a dictator, but what they do is to push through unpopular policies and rule changes under the radar. They do this through burying program cuts deep in budgets and never discussing the issue; through issuing executive orders, such as changing the rules for requirements when "updating" coal power plants; through meeting in secret with corporations to write national policy, while excluding popular interest groups or public opinion; and through stonewalling on the approval of drugs which meet science requirements but not their philosophy.

In the end, all of this degrades the democratic process; heck, it is a direct attack on the values of governance in our country, including the values of public debate, transparency and accountability. But little by little, rule by rule, and policy by policy, it continues. At this point the Bush administration's tactics have been quite destructive to numerous institutions that many Americans consider essential to the public good. Entire agencies have being virtually eviscerated and no longer are to fulfill their basic mandates. A few examples include the EPA, the FDA and FEMA.

If most Americans paid close attention to what is being done, and granted the administration doesn't make this easy, then Bush's popularity rating would be in the low 20s.

David
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
This is just nuts.

Now, I can see how ideology can blind the Bush administration and, being charitable, can float the argument that even if they do stuff that has bad consequences, it's somehow good for the country in the long run. Some freakish laissez faire experiment, with some skimming off the top to make it worthwhile.

I don't see how on earth I can shoehorn closing down the EPA libraries into that theory. Unless they believe that all scientists are commies or something.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Now, I can see how ideology can blind the Bush administration and, being charitable, can float the argument that even if they do stuff that has bad consequences, it's somehow good for the country in the long run. Some freakish laissez faire experiment, with some skimming off the top to make it worthwhile.

I don't see how on earth I can shoehorn closing down the EPA libraries into that theory. Unless they believe that all scientists are commies or something.


Here's the plan. First you shut down the EPA libraries.

In a few years, you complain that the EPA doesn't release any of the data and studies they do to the public so their funding is being wasted. Then you clear out the EPA and replace them with coal lobbyists.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Here's the plan. First you shut down the EPA libraries.

In a few years, you complain that the EPA doesn't release any of the data and studies they do to the public so their funding is being wasted. Then you clear out the EPA and replace them with coal lobbyists.



So it's just a part of that "skimming of the top" that I mentioned, just more dangerous than, say, tax breaks for rich guys.
Print the post Back To Top