Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
but was disappointed to find that I didn't like it as much as my 2004. It seemed a bit smaller to me, and I was later able to verify that that's because it really is. Plus, it was missing some of the convenient little compartments to stash things that I like in my 04. And since the performance specs were about the same,

compare the dimensions:

dimensions for 2004:

for 2010:

They are substantially the same. The 2010 is a bit bigger in some dimensions and a bit smaller in others...mostly fractions of an inch.
When sitting in the drivers seat the 2010 feels a bit smaller because the center console is quite different and feels more like a cockpit.
True about fewer compartments and less space for water bottles in the door, etc. They added more door insulation to reduce road noise...only a regular bottle big Gulps. If you can get over the difference in the center console, the 2010+ is better in mpg. It is a lot easier to get 55-60 mpg on some trips, regardless of EPA official numbers. And it has EV mode which (mildly) lets you force running on the battery and Power mode which changes the throttle response making you think the car has a lot more power.

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.