https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chart-shows-17-us-companies-1...So, my question is why isn't BRK on this list? Lazy research/reporting? Fake news?
Lazy research/reporting?Sounds right.For some reason Berkshire seems to have some sort of invisibility field.Not a problem for me, as long as the cash keeps rolling in.Jim
Lazy research/reporting?Sounds right.For some reason Berkshire seems to have some sort of invisibility field.With Berkshire's $100B cash pile, it's a pretty big oversight to miss the #3.They're a day late for reporting that Gilead has $36.6B in cash, too.dtb
So, my question is why isn't BRK on this list? Lazy research/reporting?My best guess: the list is really that of "non-financial" companies and Berkshire is classified as a financial.* Of course, one can debate whether Berkshire should be lumped in the same category as banks and hum drum insurers, but that's a separate issue.* - if I am correct, then there still is laziness in reporting. Their data source is some report from BAC, I am guessing somewhere in that report it does say "non-financial". *insert rant about second hand sources here*.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |