No. of Recommendations: 1
Contrary to the charge of racism, the election of Trump was based on economic issues & rejection of the ruling establishment elites. And those economic issues are occurring in other nation.
This article sums it up quite nicely:
http://www.unz.com/mwhitney/brzezinskis-warning-to-america/
By now, most people are familiar with the demonstrations that have rocked Paris, the political cage-match that is tearing apart England (Brexit), the rise of anti-immigrant right-wing groups that have sprung up across Europe, and the surprising rejection of the front-runner candidate in the 2016 presidential elections in the US. Everywhere the establishment and their neoliberal policies are being rejected by the masses of working people who have only recently begun to wreak havoc on a system that has ignored them for more than 30 years. Trump’s public approval ratings have improved, not because he has “drained the swamp” as he promised, but because he is still seen as a Washington outsider despised by the political class, the foreign policy establishment and the media. His credibility rests on the fact that he is hated by the coalition of elites who working people now regard as their sworn enemy.

President Trump is not responsible for the outbreak of populism and social unrest, he is merely an expression of the peoples rage. Trump’s presidential triumph was a clear rejection of the thoroughly-rigged elitist system that continues to transfer the bulk of the nation’s wealth to tiniest layer of people at the top.


And to commonly held view that the immigration issues was a prime mover for a vote for Trump; there is this study:
https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=1490970830811211...

Here, we examine whether demographic changes at low levels of ag- gregation were associated with vote shifts toward an anti-immigration presidential candidate between 2012 and 2016. To do so, we compile a novel, precinct-level data set of election re- sults and demographic measures for more than 26,000 precincts in Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. We employ regression analyses varying model specifications and measures of demographic change. Our estimates uncover little evidence that influxes of Hispanics or non-citizen immigrants benefitted Trump relative to past Republicans, and in fact suggest that these changes helped his opponent, Hillary Clinton.

In contrast to a theory of demographic threat driving voters towards the anti-immigration can- didate Trump in 2016, the figure shows a negative relationship between increasing Hispanic pop- ulations and increasing Republican support. This association holds for either the between-election time period of 2011 to 2016 or the longer time period of 2000 to 2016. We plot proportional changes in the third and fourth frames. These both show a flat relationship between proportional change and change in Republican support.4
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.