No. of Recommendations: 0
Dear thalseth,

First, you are using Stewart's definition of FCF, which isn't the same as the Fool's.

Second, if you use Stewart's terminology, your line "NOPAT * (1 - tax rate)" would be "NOPBT", or "net operating profit before taxes". You are calculating NOPAT.

Third, I think that it may be more accurate to use the cash taxes rate in the cash flow statement. However, I'm a bit confused myself about this, since Stewart doesn't use the cash flow statement at all. Yet I don't see how to get the 32% tax rate.

Fourth, for an opinion more accurate than mine, try the Boring Stocks board, guys like FoolishFloyd there will go through these calculations in tremendous depth.

Fifth, it is hard for me to say whether this is "good, bad or indifferent" without knowing a bit more about the company (what does it do, etc.? BTW, why did you pick them?). In particular, going free cash flow negative isn't necessarily a bad thing for an expanding company. We need to get a "trend" or projection over several years for FCF to be useful.

Lleweilun Smith
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.