No. of Recommendations: 0
Did I miss something? If dollar cost averaging produces better returns 2/3 of the time, and lump-sum investing produces better returns 1/3 of the time, then why is lump-sum a clear choice? (Especially since that study only examined 6 months' worth of DCA contributions.)

I have 34 years till retirement. If I were contributing $2000 to an IRA each year from now till then, I'd rather make 408 monthly contributions than 34 annual contributions. Over that period of time, doesn't dollar-cost averaging show a clear advantage? (leaving aside the cash flow question - let's assume I have $2000 ready to invest each January.)
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.