Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 72
I wrote this a few months back on the KP board. I just dusted it off and was surprised how much still stands true today.

I thought I would recycle it on the NPI board. Sorry if this is a repeat.

10 Lessons Learned from the Internet boom and bust.

1) Don't bet against innovation.

The bull market began in 1982. Why? In the early 1980's entrepreneurship and innovation began to be systematically accepted in the United States as valid business practices. Venture capital changed from being a cottage business into being a well-organized industry. New forms of credit became available to support entrepreneurs. Books and schools now teach the best practices of entrepreneurship. It is this wave of innovation, more than anything else, which has led to our recent productivity gains and increased standard of living.

Nothing has altered the trend toward entrepreneurship and innovation. Recent capital excess may have provided too much capital to too many 'get-rich-quick' schemers disguised as entrepreneurs. This has been corrected.

Recent comparisons of today's situation with America in the 1920's and Japan in the 1990's discount the economic power of entrepreneurship. Japan has many structural problems but the most severe is the lack of an entrepreneurial class. Much the same can be said for America in the 1920's. Innovation unleashed will heal almost all economic bottlenecks.

This is a primarily American phenomenon. Only Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and to some degree Israel have learned the secret to America's economic prosperity. As a Canadian, I am amazed at the systematic disincentives to innovation we tolerate in the name of fairness.

Innovation is a powerful force and there is no upside in betting against it. All doom and gloom scenarios ignore innovation and are thus flawed at the core. We are in for stormy weather, no doubt. Some entrepreneur somewhere will figure out how to make a buck selling us umbrellas. This person will leads us out the current downtrend more than any analyst, author, editor, consultant or news anchor.

Follow the entrepreneur and <U>don't panic</U> until the US government implements policies that impede the dynamic force of innovation. Then, feel free to panic!

2) The market is always right.

Today, this is a hard lesson to learn. Still, the lesson is there to be learnt. Market participants have wildly divergent goals and strategies; different levels of risk tolerance; access to different information; different methods for sizing opportunity and measuring risk; and, differing temperaments and personalities. Put them all together into a giant real time auction and their collective actions consistently produce better results than any one individual. If you love a company or it's stock, you may dismiss or not understand a risk that somebody else sees and understands. If you understand a technology or an emerging market better than most, your investing actions teach the market. This is the network effect in action in real time, updated by the second and available on CNBC for the world to watch.

What about the tech bubble? History will write that the bubble in Internet and technology stocks in the last 1990's served to attract enough capital to overcome the serious technological and economic limitations of the Internet. Without high valuations and easy access to capital would the fiber-optic network have been built? Would wild-eyed Photonics scientist been funded and then forced to compete in the market place. Would the giant eCommerce experiment, which taught us what works and what does not work, have happened?

It is not pretty. It may not even be efficient. But, the market is effective. The moment we think we know better than the market is the moment we start to lose our capital.

3) Dogma stops thinking.

The bull and bear market sent everyone off to their corners to protect and defend their ideas and decisions. This is all too human. We all fight to protect our worldview and are quick to assume that somebody with a different worldview just 'doesn't get it'.

Where we get into trouble is that our worldviews discount information that doesn't fit. This is the source of the most famous sayings of the 1990's - 'This time it's different.' Well, probably not all that different.

Eventually all bulls are proven wrong and all bears are proven wrong. Momentum trading works when momentum trading works. Charts don't lie until the assumptions for interpreting the charts prove false. Long-term holding isn't forever.

So much happened over the last four years that has never happened before that nobody's models withstood all the anomalies. The only way to profit was to challenge your own personal dogma, test your models, learn and adapt.

Ever notice how many people think everybody else acts like a herd. Think about it.

4) Over the long term CAP wins.

Great companies in growing markets with the strongest and best-protected competitive positions create wealth. The best technology does not always win. The best product does not always win. The best management does not always win. The best competitive position always wins. Over the medium to long term companies with inferior competitive positions destroy wealth.

This is the beginning, middle and end of the valuation debate – wealth creation capacity. Keep wealth creators. Sell wealth destroyers. Learn how to measure wealth creation capacity.

The key to understanding wealth creation is to understand competitive strategy. Coca-Cola has created so much wealth because it consistently has the superior competitive strategy. Coke also has a long history of changing strategy when the current strategy stops working. Competitive strategy is not a fixed entity. It changes from industry to industry and from time to time. Following competitive strategy is like following the rainbow. It is elusive but that's where the gold is.

5) Understand your learning risk.

Recently, some friends were complaining about how much money they lost in Nortel shares. I gave them a simple test: given that electrons and photons both travel at the speed of light, why are photons better suited for high speed data communications and why don't we replace all electronic equipment with photonic equipment? They barely understood the question let alone the answer. I only knew because I had bought and read a couple of introductory quantum mechanics books.

This is truly the knowledge age and we all have a limited capacity to study and learn. How much of your learning capacity you are willing to invest is a critical part of your investing strategy. If you don't understand a technology, a market, or an industry: hire a fund manager who does or stick to industries you know.

Nobody has perfect knowledge and everybody has a learning risk. Understand what you know and what you don't know and what you are willing to learn. Inside that box you have an advantage. Outside that box you are at a disadvantage.

There is a saying in poker, “If you don't know who the mark is within 30 minutes – it's you.' The same principle applies to investing.

6) Industrial economics matter more than macroeconomics.

Macroeconomics is important but the economics of an industry have a much larger impact on the companies in that industry. Traditionally, technology was immune from recessions. Without understanding the overcapacities built up in technology lost many people a lot of money.

Even more important, particularly in technology, it is industry economics that drive end applications. Large companies attempting to rid themselves of bureaucracy and to provide the right information to the right people at the right time drove the PC age. This gave rise to various forms of productivity applications: from the spreadsheet to the fully integrated accounting system.

Unfortunately, macroeconomics makes better headlines. The width of Alan Greenspan's briefcase is news worthy. The balance sheet of the telecommunications industry cannot compete.

7) Master your discipline AND extend your toolkit.

Fundamental analysts make money. Better fundamental analysts make more money. Technical analysts make money. Better technical analysts make more money. Whatever your method the key is to success is to master the method. Experiment a little. Exchange ideas with people smarter than you. Read the source books again. I am constantly amazed how much I learn every time I reread The Gorilla Game or The Innovators Dilemma. Be careful of the human pull to complacency when things go well and blame when things don't go well.

Mastery comes out of your mistakes not from your wins. Early celebration reinforces bad habits.

Other disciplines can offer everybody something. Even the most ardent Gorilla Gamer or Rule Maker would benefit from a little understanding of the impact of supply and demand on the price of a stock. There are ways to risk reduce your buying and selling even if you are a LTBH investor. The same is true far technical analysts. Some fundamental tools can help risk reduce your trading decisions.

This interdisciplinary approach will have gone too far when people starting seeing 'Peeling Banana' patterns on the chart of a Gorilla candidate.

8) Understand your investing strategy and financial goals.

Stick to your game plan. As Paul Simon says, “Breakdowns come, Breakdowns go, it's watcha gonna do about it I want to know”.

Avoid betting your child's education fund on the latest George Gilder photonic poster child unless following Gilder is your strategy and you are in the process of mastering that strategy. Don't invest on margin until you understand the risks involved and are convinced that those risks match your financial goals. The guy on the train who made a bundle last week writing covered calls might not have children and a mortgage to think through. He also may be complete idiot, you just never can tell.

Decide whom to trust and then trust them as long as their advice is consistent with your goals. I love taking care of other people's children. I get to wind 'em up and send them back to their parents. Lot's of people are willing to do that with your money.

Most of the people running for the hills today should never have been out in this weather without the proper protective clothing.

9) Disruptive technology is still the largest wealth creating force.

This is key. Nothing has changed about the economic impact of technology except our expectations. The Internet does not change everything but it sure does impact a lot of things and we have really just begun. The first car was invented in the 1880's but Ford was not mass-producing the Model T until the early 1920's and Alfred Sloan didn't figure out how to manage a large automotive company until 1930. The interstate highway system began in the 1950's and didn't finish until the early 1970's.

History will write that the time from the first IBM System 360 in 1964(?) to the deregulation of the Internet in 1993 as the 'horse and buggy' period in technology. We are just now seeing the business benefits promised by technology showing up in economic measures.

There are many excellent growth industries and growth companies. Biotech and Energy stand out to me but there are many others. However, none of these industries is impact the economic infrastructure of the world in the way technology has and will continue.

A word of caution – I consider another technology bubble very likely. Eventually the current skepticism will fade and another new technology with massive economic promise will arrive and the same conditions that created the Internet bubble will exist. This will not happen next year or the year after but it will come.

The early warning sign will be the first person who says – “This time it's different'.

10) The Web is an early Internet application but NOT the last Internet application.

Many people were introduced to the Internet via the World Wide Web and equate these two technologies. Avoiding an overly technical discussion, keep in mind that the Internet is not the same thing as the World Wide Web. The Web was the second killer application for the Internet (e-mail was the first).

Even the current web is only a partial implementation of what the inventor, Tim Berners-Lee, had in mind. To understand the difference, keep in mind that Napster did not use the Web but it is an Internet application. New technologies like Java and XML and Microsoft's .Net are already beginning to reshape the landscape. New materials and methods for designing and building semiconductors are just now reaching market. George Gilder's favorites continue to innovate. Tim Beners-Lee continues to labor to ensure that his complete vision is fulfilled.

And they are all driven by a passion to make the world a better place. So, don't forget, never bet against innovation.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
just one thing, electrons don't travel at the speed of light. it is inconceivable...:)
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
A truly excellent post. If you have the discipline to define your own investing techniques in such a manner as this, you will have nothing but success in the future. Very insightful for someone that really has not been in the game for very long.

Re. #2)

Have you ever read "The Alchemy of Finance" by George Soros. (while Soros is currently in most investors' doghouses, this is a great read) Soros postulates that the markets are never right. They are caught in a gyrating movement between maximum optimism and maximum pessimism. Equilibrium is rarely, if ever, accomplished. And if it is, it is merely a stop along the way to one of the extremes. His entire investment philosophy is built around identifying these types of extreme markets, and profiting from them. In the book, he outlines exactly how he does so. Of course, he is no buy and hold investor.

Does point 2 apply to micro issues. Do you feel the market always get it right in individual stocks. How does this co-exist with the Gorilla Game, if so.

I really loved Point 5. I have done that myself.

Geoff Tober
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
amade74 wrote:

...electrons don't travel at the speed of light. it is inconceivable...

True....electrons in a wire don't travel at the speed of light....

...but the electrical current carried by those electrons do travel at that speed....that's the point being made.

It's like saying that the air molecules don't travel at the speed of sound as you speak....but the sound waves, themselves, do.

Pushing this further....sound in a solid medium travels very quickly...but the molecules themselves make no real forward motion....

...FWIW....

Alan
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
sorry for being pedantic, but I thought electricity was electrons in motion? I do not have a degree in physics, but from what I understand, anything that has matter and is accelerated to speed of light would become a singularity, or a black hole. I do know that protons are accelerated in several places (Cern, then in Berkley too I think) and smashed against other particles to generate quarks, which do have masses that are higher than the original proton.

Based on quantum physics, every object can be described as a wave function, and according to this there is a probability of something not being where we put it when we are not looking, like the life-death duality of schroedingers cat.

Anyway, like I said, I have no degree in physics.

And after I posted my smartass remark, I realized that I forgot to put how I really felt about the post, THANKS FOR IT, I really did like it, and also linked it to another board ;)
amade
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
...but the electrical current carried by those electrons do travel at that speed....that's the point being made.

Alevine,

I will attempt to clear up some confusion about what is and isn't going at the speed of light. First off, neither electrons nor electric current travels at the speed of light. The electric field, a component of light, does "move" at the speed of light. Electric current does move at some speed close to the speed of light (~0.8 c).

I have spent a little time searching the net for something conclusive on this topic. So far I have come up with these tiny references:
http://www.nr.cc.mn.us/Physics/Courses/1999Fall/1122/Current.htm
http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys345/class/02-current.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/miccur.html

Searching these links for "speed of light" should back up what I'm asserting.

Pete@I'mTooDumbTooExplainThisMyselfAndTooLazyToLookAnyFurtherRightNow.com
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
10) The Web is an early Internet application but NOT the last Internet application.


Spot on....
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Spot on....

A wonderful bit of TMF/NPI archeology! Not only is the OP wonderful, it even has a bit of politics "As a Canadian, I am amazed at the systematic disincentives to innovation we tolerate in the name of fairness," but the thread is also a lesson on how to derail threads at the speed of light!

Denny Schlesinger
Print the post Back To Top