Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
DW tells me that under FL law, a contractor is not legally an agent of the client, regardless of the language of the contract. Her firm does a lot of construction litigation, and this opinion was confirmed by one of the partners she works closely with.

On the other hand, she spoke with a local accountant (the father of one of the other attorneys), and he said this question has come up a few times. He said its very common for people to take the sales tax deduction in this scenario, even if the contractor paid the sales tax for the materials. He suggested we go ahead and claim it. I'm not sure to what extent he's trying to trying to gauge the "intent" of the rule vs. the true legal definition.

I have another good friend from college who is an accountant, and I think I'm going to solicit his opinon before I wrap up this year's taxes.

At the moment, I am leaning towards skipping this deduction, just to play it safe.
Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.