No. of Recommendations: 0
Egad! I didn't realize the FCC had changed this regulation. Ultimately it could adversely impact those of us who still don't subscribe to cable or satellite and choose to use an antenna. I guess it depends on the details of the regulation change.

Prior to this, cable companies had to provide local programming to people wherever they provided service. This was a regulation concession they made to the existing TV broadcasters when they allowed cable companies to come in. The existing broadcasters were worried that cable would come in and replace them, making it impossible for them to compete. The unintended consequence of the regulation was that it made it possible for any station to put up a low cost/low wattage transmitter and get to piggyback on the cable companies to expand their coverage (and therefore their ad revenue). Many small stations are only viable because of the combined air wave/cable audience.

If cable companies still have to include local stations in every package they offer, I guess it will be okay. But if they get to scramble the local channels and charge separately or place them in an optional package, then the business model for local stations changes dramatically. My guess is that a local station optional packaging capability would cause a serious fall-out of a lot of local stations and programming.
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.