Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 6
Four years ago, president Trump was called out as a dictator for issuing those four executive orders so quickly after being inaugurated. Interesting count:

Executive orders by president in the first week of office.
Joe Biden: 33
Barack Obama: 5
Donald J. Trump: 4
Bill Clinton: 1
George W. Bush: 0

https://twitter.com/Lancegooden/status/1354119023928242176
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 15
Four years ago, president Trump was called out as a dictator for issuing those four executive orders so quickly after being inaugurated. Interesting count:

Executive orders by president in the first week of office.
Joe Biden: 33
Barack Obama: 5
Donald J. Trump: 4
Bill Clinton: 1
George W. Bush: 0 - CuriousQ


--------------------

It is much easier for Biden since he doesn't have to take the time to read and understand what he is signing.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 6
"It is much easier for Biden since he doesn't have to take the time to read and understand what he is signing"



Just the leftist progressive 'wish list' - a giant lurch to the left....a disaster in the making. Prepared by Pelosi, the gang of four, and Obama era leftovers.....


t.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
It is not hard to identify anti-American Executive Orders issued by Spankee. Thus, Biden was able to have a significant number of new Executive Orders ready in advance, thus killing/reversing the anti-American ones issued under the previous administration.

Imagine the consequences if the Executive Orders issued by another President prevented immigration to the US from any Christian country.... Oh, you can NOT imagine it? ROFLMAO !!!! Yet Christian countries are the greatest source of terrorism inside the US.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Obiden signed more EO in his first week then did ALL previous Presidents in their first week combined.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 7
Obiden signed more EO in his first week then did ALL previous Presidents in their first week combined.

Didn't he call Trump a dictator for just signing a couple?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Didn't he call Trump a dictator for just signing a couple?

I don't recall him saying that, but Trump signed 220 in four years compared to Obama with 276 in eight years and 291 with Bush in eight years. I'd say that's more than just a couple.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
I don't recall him saying that, but Trump signed 220 in four years compared to Obama with 276 in eight years and 291 with Bush in eight years. I'd say that's more than just a couple. - dsemmler

------------------

In all fairness, Trump was forced to issue more-or-less the same EO multiple times due the parade of liberal lawsuits filed with the admiration and support of a sympathetic/activist 8th Circuit.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
He did but I can't find a link to it today.

I did find an article "Trump's Dictatorial Tendencies"
By Jacob Hornberger

You can substitute Biden's name for Trumps to get the dems talking points on this.


Trump's dictatorial decrees consist of extending unemployment benefits, suspending the payroll tax, implementing an eviction moratorium, and suspending student loan payments.

These are all actions that lie exclusively under the prerogative of Congress. Trump can ask Congress to enact them, but he has no authority to implement them as president. In doing so, he is behaving as a dictator.


That's what a dictator does. He dictates. He orders. He commands. He doesn't have to go to a legislative body and ask for permission. He doesn't have to concern himself with a judiciary that can declare his actions unconstitutional. He just issues decrees, orders, edicts, and commands. Everyone is expected to obey and comply.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 4
Most of Biden’s EOs are simply rollbacks of Trump’s EOs, thus cancelling the effect of all EOs

1 + (-1) = O

More properly, let’s call Biden the destroyer of executive orders
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Not all of the EOs are just cancellations of Trump executive orders. Biden has signed an EO to reopen enrollment for ACA and to expand who is eligible. Biden is following the outcomes proposed by the Kaiser Family Foundation. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 15 million uninsured people will receive insurance at very affordable rates following the current guidelines set forth in the EO signed by Biden.
Conservatives are quick to criticize the ACA. Their answer? It's better for 15 million Americans to be uninsured than to have the ACA giving you affordable healthcare insurance. Even if you had to pay a $2,000 family deductible, how is it better to have no insurance coverage at all?
I guess it's the same argument that contends that if we give 90% of the aggregate capital to 1% of the population, then we'll get really good jobs.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 12
The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 15 million uninsured people will receive insurance at very affordable rates following the current guidelines set forth in the EO signed by Biden. - Tucsonbones

Too bad that doesn't say "citizens".

=========

Conservatives are quick to criticize the ACA. Their answer? It's better for 15 million Americans to be uninsured than to have the ACA giving you affordable healthcare insurance. - more Tucson

Does that include Central and South Americans who are here illegally?

Should a charitable person provide food to strangers who break into his kitchen when his own family is going hungry?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0

Does that include Central and South Americans who are here illegally?
Should a charitable person provide food to strangers who break into his kitchen when his own family is going hungry?


What are you referring to?
The same old racist screed that black men are raping the white women. Then you get all upset when people call you a racist, Trump calls Mexicans Rapists, You got on that train and you'll never get off.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 10
>>Does that include Central and South Americans who are here illegally?
Should a charitable person provide food to strangers who break into his kitchen when his own family is going hungry?<<

What are you referring to? - Tucson


---------------------

I am refering to the caravans, like the one forming in Guatamala right now, delivering new dependents to the USA for us to take care fo, when we have people already here who deserve those resources.

I suppose as a lib you think the US taxpayer has the capacity to fund medical, housing, schooling, lawyers, criminal justice, etc as necessary to any human on the planet who manages to grift his way into our country. Open borders and extensive social services are at odds with one another.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
TucsonBones

To dispel the myth of low deductibles on ACA, a single person in my state has an 8K deductible for a bronze plan.
But it is insurance, not at a cheap price, but it is insurance.
As you said, better than nothing~

Even if you had to pay a $2,000 family deductible, how is it better to have no insurance coverage at all?

nag
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Then doesn't Trump's executive order to cancel Obama's executive order cancel each other out?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
"Trump calls Mexicans Rapists,"

So if a white guy kills someone, then by your logic all white guys are murderers,right?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Even if you had to pay a $2,000 family deductible, how is it better to have no insurance coverage at all?"

It's more like $20,000 deductible on a family plan.

t.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Does that include Central and South Americans who are here illegally?

Sure why not. Its not like there are so many of them.
Its not like they were offered insurance and declined

Travel the world and see Americans get sick and treated, very often at no cost.

Why?

Because they did not have insurance, their insurance did not cover overseas travel or the provider could not be bothered with dealing with the BS that US insurance companies put them through.

There again, well off Americans just pay the bill and say. Gee how come it's so cheap

Damn socialist countries
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
Biden has signed an EO to reopen enrollment for ACA and to expand who is eligible.

The Obama ACA is the healthcare program where the foxes are in charge of the hen house - which reminds, the Kleptocracy is back!


-=Ajax=-
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
To dispel the myth of low deductibles on ACA

My deductibles, copays and premiums increased astronomically each and every year after it became affordable...and I'm not on the exchange.

Additionally the requirement for me to pay to carry everybody else's "children" until they are 27 is BS. If parents want to help their kids until then, they can do as I did and buy them a policy and pay for it.

I don't like paying for the additional ACA coverage I don't need either such a drug addiction treatment. I don't use drugs.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 5
>>Does that include Central and South Americans who are here illegally?<<

Sure why not. Its not like there are so many of them.
Its not like they were offered insurance and declined

Travel the world and see Americans get sick and treated, very often at no cost. - bobsdonuts


---------------------------

So to rationalize you wokeness you are equating the thousands in the caravans coning here to stay with tourist, worldwide travelers who happen to get sick while vacationing here. There is no point of trying to reason with someone whose logic is so twisted.

PS - of course a tourist here temporarily and even an illegal living here should receive emergency medical care while here. However, providing long term treatment for a chronic disease at taxpayer expense should not be, such treatment should be provided in the persons home country.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 2
I don't like paying for the additional ACA coverage I don't need either such a drug addiction treatment. I don't use drugs. - JoRoski

-------------------

However, you never know when you might need gender re-assignment surgery. That sort of thing can sneak up on you.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
I don't like paying for the additional ACA coverage I don't need either such a drug addiction treatment. I don't use drugs.

It is not legal for anyone to sell us medical-care insurance that lacks maternity coverage.

I've had a vasectomy.

My lady had a total hysterectomy before she was 40. She's now past 60.

Insurance is supposed to be about RISK.

How much RISK is there of my lady becoming pregnant?
Print the post Back To Top