Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
Fingfool writes in part:

<<I too voted for Barry in my second presidential election, which I guess merely proves that we are both relatively advanced in age and not hesitant to reveal it.>>

LOL. But speak for yourself. My bio clearly indicates I'm only 29. In fact, my daughters are both older than I am.

<<(2) As you indicate, the system is not under our personal control and as such may not live up to the Security part of the name. However, into the near future at least, we do have a contract of sorts with the Federal government that allows us to use a payment schedule to plan for our retirement. Or do you use some kind of factor in your calculations that is based on a confidence level of receiving payments? >>

I think those above the age of 50 will get pretty much what was promised. I fear, though, for those who are younger.

<<(3) Under Myth 3 you state that you will receive all that you put into SS after 3.4 to 4.4 years of collecting SS, depending on when you start receiving payments. This is very misleading. As you well know, if you take the total payments that you and your employer have put into the fund over your working time and calculate what kind of nest egg you would have at retirement, it comes to a much larger payment then you will receive from SS - even with a relatively conservative return rate and a healthy deduction to pay a disability insurance premium. The advantage works even for relatively low wage earners.>>

I don't disagree. It all depends on how you count the employer's contribution. I view it as similar to a match in a 401k plan. It was previously untaxed to me, and thus is fair game to the gummint. Others say it should be counted as part of your imputed pay for working. It's a legitimate argument on both sides.

<<(4) Under Myth 2 you indicate that since people tend to spend for the moment they should not be trusted to save/invest money on their own and furthermore should be saved from the consequences of their actions. This is the tired old argument for SS. I would ask: if people cannot be educated to do the prudent thing (which I believe they can, particularly if they are forced to face the consequences ala welfare reform) how do we expect them to make reasonable decisions in the voting booth? >>

If I had the magic answer to either question, I would be the first to declaim same from the rooftops.

<<Can we start a discussion about the effects of inflation on retirement savings with some historical perspective? >>

Feel free to kick it off. That's what the message board is for.

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.