No. of Recommendations: 0
help,
tonight 4/22/ 98 tmf sheard suggests that only 10,000 to 20,000 be invested in the foolish four yet on another occasion he intimated that the foolish four was a good investment vehicle for ira accounts. i just opened an ira with 20,000 and plan to fund it max contribution yearly. this will far exceed the recomended 10-20 k in the not to distant future . question is am i on the right track?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Greetings, Flakey, and welcome.

<<tonight 4/22/ 98 tmf sheard suggests that only 10,000 to 20,000 be invested in the foolish four yet on another occasion he intimated that the foolish four was a good investment vehicle for ira accounts. i just opened an ira with 20,000 and plan to fund it max contribution yearly. this will far exceed the recomended 10-20 k in the not to distant future . question is am i on the right track? correction for previous message the amount reccomended by tmf sheard was 5,000 to 10,000 not 10,000 to 20,000 i hope im not confusing anyone other than me.>>

Robert was talking about individual risk tolerance when he said, "Even four stocks alone is too concentrated a portfolio for my sleep-factor. Once you get up to a level of about $5,000 or $10,000, I feel you have to begin diversifying into other stocks as well to avoid putting too much emphasis on any one stock." That's his opinion and his philosophy. But it's certainly a shame he put a price tag on his diversification. Why? Because he also has said in the past that 12 to 15 stocks is more than enough for one's total portfolio

Think about that and think about how portfolios are supposed to grow. If my portfolio reaches $225K, even with an equal split I would have to have at least $15K in every stock. That's 50% more than the $10K number he used. Therefore, knowing Robert as I do, I doubt strenuously he was proposing that sum as a ceiling for the Foolish Four as a whole or even individually. Rather, he was stressing that for HIM he would not use that approach to the exclusion of the rest of the stock universe.

Better in my mind had Robert said something like, "The Foolish Four can be the core of my portfolio, but I won't let that core exceed 10% (or 25% or 50%) of the portfolio's total value when I reach a total value of $10,000." Those or similar words may have made his intent clearer. At least that's how I interpret what he meant.

You have to decide for yourself what makes you comfortable. Also, you have to decide what percentage of your portfolio will constitute the core. And nothing except your ability to sleep at night says how large or how small that must be.

Regards….Pixy

Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
<<tonight 4/22/ 98 tmf sheard suggests that only 5,000 to 10,000 be invested in the foolish four yet
on another occasion he intimated that the foolish four was a good investment vehicle for ira
accounts. i just opened an ira with 20,000 and plan to fund it max contribution yearly. this will far
exceed the recomended...>>

Hmmm... I didn't interpret his comments with any "only" in there. What he said was:

"Even four stocks alone is too concentrated a portfolio for my sleep-factor. Once you get up to a level of about $5,000 or $10,000, I feel you have to begin diversifying into other stocks as well to avoid putting too much emphasis on any one stock."

How I interpreted that is that once you get a couple of thousand in each stock, you can BEGIN to buy other stocks before adding to what you've already got. So if the IRA is part of your total portfolio, your diversification could occur in the other parts of your portfolio. If your IRA is most of your portfolio, you could either have FF and some others in the IRA, or you could choose a different course than TMF Sheard!
Print the post Back To Top