Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Interesting decision to take Daniel Jones at #6. I understand if they liked him better than Haskins (they know way more about evaluating talent than most of us do) but why not wait until the 17th pick and use the 6th pick on someone else (Allen, Oliver, etc)?

Jones was projected back of the 1st/early 2nd. Very unlikely another team would have reached out for him before pick 17. Redskins took Haskins at 15, were the Giants afraid they would have taken Jones there if they had the chance?
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.