Skip to main content
Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 3
Milton Friedman has often said that government budget deficits are not nearly as big a problem as the level of government spending. To see the truth of MF's point, consider a simple example of two states, Graustark and Ruritania, and the fiscal positions of each government, ceteris paribus.

The numbers are small to keep it simple.

Graustark

GDP $10,000,000
Govt. Spending 3,000,000
Tax Revenue 3,000,000
Deficit 0

Ruritania

GDP $10,000,000
Govt. Spending 600,000
Tax Revenue 500,000
Deficit 100,000

Graustark's state has a balanced budget, but spends 30% of the country's GDP. Ruritania's state is running a deficit of $100,000, which is 1% of its GDP, but its fiscal burden is much smaller than Graustark's. Ruritania could even increase its spending by a relatively large percentage and still not engage in anywhere near as much of what Rothbard called government depradation as Graustark.

Which country would you rather live in?

ValueSnark
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.