Non-financial boards have been closed but will continue to be accessible in read-only form. If you're disappointed, we understand. Thank you for being an active participant in this community. We have more community features in development that we look forward to sharing soon.
Great and nice, but I'm missing the new, positive ID-evidence. This looks like the so-manieth repeat of : "Evolution can't explain everything, so ID must be true".For instance, it would have been better if he had explained why he thinks the idea of a primitive RNA world is science-fiction. Linking to Wikipedia seems a bit weak as argument. That just shows there are different theories, all of them with holes in them and that research is ongoing. But that's good enough for ID-ists to claim, ID is true ! Without adding any positive evidence for it of course.Do you see how silly that seems to those who devote their life to scientific research ?He laughed. “Dave”, he said, “the RNA world is science fiction. There are more holes in it than there are in all the highway signs in Texas. None of the chemistry is realistic.” So, all these scientists are idiots. Of course ID hasn't any holes because there's not even the beginning of a road leading to somewhere.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |