No. of Recommendations: 0
Greetings CentexHorn,

I looked closer at Fidelity...the expense ratio shows to be .1%, but then it says something like "combined expenses" is .83%. I guess that's where the underlying funds get their cut, right?

Yes and so your cost as measured by the expense ratio if you hold the fund is .83% while those running the fund only take .1% since they aren't doing much. Don't forget that transaction costs, those costs incurred by buying and selling securities, aren't part of the expense ratio.

Are you saying Vanguard does not have this extra layer of fees?


That the .25% or whatever they show is the REAL cost?

No, but it is the real expense ratio. There are also transaction costs not mentioned in the expense ratio but are factored in when looking at published returns.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.