No. of Recommendations: 0
>> The concern isn't even to maximize your total lifetime income from SS. The concern is outliving your money. I'm sure it REALLY SUCKS to have to learn to like the taste of Alpo at 90. <<

EXACTLY this. I don't manage retirement savings to maximize my average case ROI. I manage it to *minimize* my chances of outliving my money. The two goals are not the same.

>> To be real blunt, I think it's stupid to voluntarily be dependant on SS for a significant part of your retirement income. <<

I might not go quite this far. I'd say that anyone under the age of 50 shouldn't plan to get as much as they are being told to expect right now, but I honestly don't think SS is going anywhere. It may be reduced for folks not at (or close to) retirement age, but even those who are younger -- especially if they aren't high-income -- are likely to receive at least 2/3 (if not more) of what they expect to get today.

That assumes, of course, common sense fiscal reforms that stop bloating the debt. And maybe that's the lynchpin on which you are speaking, and yeah, that's possible.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.