No. of Recommendations: 0
>> This looks like a no-brainer, as she gets the deduction for 2009 but all the money ends up in a Roth. That's the reason I feel there must be some sort of rule prohibiting this. Can someone inform me? Thanks much! <<

I don't believe there's a problem with this. It's really not a free lunch, as you will be "paying back" the value of the 2009 tax deduction with the taxes paid on the conversion in 2010.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.