Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 0
>> Why? Looking at monthly S&P Composite Index since 1871, there has been exactly ONE 15 year period that you would have lost money and NO 30 year periods that money was lost. IMHO, you're really not taking on much risk when you have a long time horizon. <<

True, but different people have different needs and wants, even when they are 25 or 30.

Some people want to maximize their expected portfolio and will accept a greater risk that they will fall short of what they need.

Others want to maximize their chances of getting to where they want to be, when they want to be there, and want to take the minimum possible risk to get them there.

The former should go all-out in stocks for the first decade or two. The latter, even at a younger age, may want to determine the return they need and look for an "efficient frontier" that's likely to get them there (or a little above that) with a minimum of risk.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.