No. of Recommendations: 0
Guilder's message on FiberChannel SAN vs. directly connected NAS over ethernet, FastEthernet GigabitEtherbet is looking well into the future. A good contrasting article in the latest Network Magazine (Nov. 99) by Anita Karve' sums up the differences very well and is more relevant to todays network managers. In addition to pointing out that NAS vendors only offer FastEthernet (100M) and cannot provide redundancy for each other, she states:

"Another Downside to NAS is the lask of cohesion amoung sorage devices. While disk arrrays and tape drives are on the LAN, managing the devices can prove challenging since they are separate entities and not logically tied together. NAS has its place as a viable storage architecture, but larger enterprises need something a few steps beyond."

In disclosure; I am a subsriber to GTR and have been very satisfied with the information and outlook provided. We need to remember that GG looks way down the pipe (that sparkly optic one anyway). Well worth reading other points of view.

Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.