No. of Recommendations: 2
Hawkwin: "Of course, but in practice, trying to take such away, even something as simple as a change in the method by which CPI is calculated, makes it effectively earmarked for those expecting benefits.'

Ask Dan Rostenkowski.

"I believe we would sooner cut defense spending in half before we let SS fail or suffer at 25% haircut."

The voters, maybe? The superwealthy and the Republicans they elect, I doubt very much.

'Much like ACA, the young will end up oversubsidizing the old."

That is the whole point of SS! From inception until 1983, it was pay as you go, and clearly involved a subsidy from those with earned income (paying SS tax) to those collectiong SS. Since 1983, there has been surplus revenue, but no one has seriously claimed that the plan would be "actuarilly sound" like a real pension plan, so it is stil a subsidy.

Regards, JAFO
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.