Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 11
https://nypost.com/2019/03/23/how-to-end-our-national-nightm...
Meanwhile, Trump’s vindication is a devastating rebuke to Democrats and their media handmaidens, all of whom insisted his guilt was guaranteed. Their legacy is that they ruined their own credibility, and their continuing efforts to destroy him by innuendo and investigation can only add to their disgrace.
...
Now, with Mueller finished, it is time to give equal attention to the other side of the story, of how we got here. The questions can be boiled down to two.

Was the initial decision to investigate Trump’s campaign an honest mistake by the Obama administration? Or was it an attempt to rig the election in favor of Clinton, and when that failed, overthrow a duly elected president?....
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 9
<Was the initial decision to investigate Trump’s campaign an honest mistake by the Obama administration? Or was it an attempt to rig the election in favor of Clinton, and when that failed, overthrow a duly elected president?....>


Put another way:

How much did Obama directly instruct the key people to go light on Hillary and do whatever they needed to do against Trump? His actions did not fall into the "with liberty and justice for all" category.

Obama was usually slick enough to tell Valerie Jarret what he wanted done and SHE would make sure the message got through to the various key individuals. His finger prints are not usually found on the the weaponized departments, but it stretches credibility beyond the limits to believe he had no idea what was going on. Hillary was going to ensure his legacy.

Nobody believes it was a coincidence that mere days before leaving office Obama greatly expanded the number of people and agencies who could legally send and receive sensitive intelligence information. Prior to that only a handful of people could share such information. Afterwards it was hundreds. Prior to that it would be very easy to determine just who released the info. Afterwards it was almost impossible to do so. That was no accident.

This was a bit more serious than the Clinton staff removing the "W" keys from the White House computers when Bush arrived in January 2001. I believe that Obama knew exactly what was being done all along the way. I believe that he and Valerie Jarret need to be asked specific questions on the topic while under oath.

I do not expect the mainstream media to ever ask Obama any question remotely related to the subject. They have no credibility to lose as that has long since disappeared like an ice cube on a July afternoon.



BG
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
How much did Obama directly instruct the key people to go light on Hillary and do whatever they needed to do against Trump?



The GOP blocked Obama from investigating Russian interference on behalf of Trump. Hillary did nothing wrong whatsoever, as we've learned from 30 years of investigations.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 8
Hillary did nothing wrong whatsoever, as we've learned from 30 years of investigations.

Speaking as someone who handled classified material for 33 years, Hillary did plenty wrong for which she should be held to account. I look forward to the beginning of that process.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 5
The GOP blocked Obama from investigating Russian interference on behalf of Trump

The President has powers of the executive branch, including the Justice Department, CIA, FBI, alphabet soup.

Obama was fond of executive orders, wrote many of them, regardless of the occasion.

please explain, including link the "blocking" you are referring to?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 13
Schiff and the rest of the democratic freak show who have claimed for two years that they possessed mounds of evidence of collusion and obstruction should now be charged themselves with obstruction of justice for their failure to turn over that evidence to Mueller.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Speaking as someone who handled classified material for 33 years, Hillary did plenty wrong for which she should be held to account. I look forward to the beginning of that process.



The process has already begun and completed. If she'd done something wrong, the GOP would have found it.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
please explain, including link the "blocking" you are referring to?

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396...
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Schiff and the rest of the democratic freak show who have claimed for two years that they possessed mounds of evidence of collusion and obstruction should now be charged themselves with obstruction of justice for their failure to turn over that evidence to Mueller.

Well, were they under oath when they made those claims? If not, they have the perfect defense against criminal charges: just admit, under oath, that they knew perfectly well they were making the whole thing up.

Now defending themselves against charges related to all the fabricated evidence, trying to conceal the fact that it was fabricated, and anything that WAS said under oath, would be more complex.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
The FBI found it. Don't hang your hat on Comey's exoneration. Hillary deserves her time in court, sport.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 4
The FBI found it. Don't hang your hat on Comey's exoneration. Hillary deserves her time in court, sport.

But if the FBI under Comey found evidence of Hillary's guilt, does that evidence still exist?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
warrl,

We'll see.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
...just admit, under oath, that they knew perfectly well they were making the whole thing up...

My point exactly. Force them to either do that or the other you mention.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 3
The GOP blocked Obama from investigating Russian interference on behalf of Trump

thank you for the link. Biden is speaking about a letter specificallywarning of Russia's role in the election, whereas McConell's office shows a bi-partisan letter warning states of election interference without specifically singling out Russia.

and yet, i recall Obama speaking on more than one occassion about election interference, and then curiously, not.

this link does not answer why Obama did not act.
... within the executive branch, he had the authority to instruct the DOJ/FBI to investigate whether the public was informed or not. Did he do this? Why not?
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 1
Hillary did nothing wrong whatsoever, as we've learned from 30 years of investigations.

roflmao
Print the post Back To Top