Skip to main content
No. of Recommendations: 6
Hi kelbon,

I was wondering why there are no banks in the portfolio?

Excellent question my friend. Before I answer, let me offer you an opportunity. Pitch a bank for the portfolio that passes on the criteria spelled out below. If you convince me, I'll write a "Why XXX Stock is Worth Owning" article announcing an intent to buy, then, if the valuation holds after the Fool's disclosure policy allows, I'll buy it for the iPIG portfolio. If you'd like, I'd be happy to credit you with the pitch in that article.

Dividend: Reasonable history, solid dividend coverage, recent dividend growth, and reason to believe the dividend growth can continue.
Valuation: At or below fair value using a fundamentals-oriented valuation methodology. If it's a methodology that requires a discount rate, please use 12% or higher as the discount rate.
Balance Sheet: Convince me it's healthy enough to survive another financial meltdown like the one we lived through in this past decade & help me understand why I should believe its dividend would remain covered & stable or growing in such a meltdown.
Diversification: This one should be easy, as there are no other banks in the portfolio. :-)
Exchange: I need to be able to buy the bank's stock on a major US exchange. Foreign banks are ok, but only if they're buyable on a major US Exchange.
Market Cap: It's very difficult to write these types of articles & publicly manage a portfolio on the Fool site if the companies involved have market caps below $300 million. Smaller cap companies can be volatile, the Fool's articles can be influential, and anything even coming close to the potential appearance of a "pump and dump" scam needs to be avoided. Please pick a company with a market cap above $300 million to make that not an issue.

Be forewarned, I may come back with clarifying questions...

Now, on to the original question...
There are two reasons why there are currently no banks in the portfolio:
1) Screening
2) A portfolio manager with a lousy history of real-money investments in bank stocks.

Screening: Most of the portfolio picks started with screens that included balance sheet measures & dividend measures. A lot of banks slashed their dividends and/or wrote down assets because of the financial meltdown & thus didn't pass the screen. Many of the banks that did pass were, as you mentioned, smaller community banks. Many of those wind up below that $300 million threshold. That makes them tough for "intend to buy" or "intend to sell" articles for the Fool.

History: Darn near every bank stock I've ever owned imploded. Some completely died in the financial meltdown. Some slashed their dividends & haven't really started recovering. One even looked incredibly healthy during the meltdown, then tried to commit suicide by making some incredibly ill-timed and poorly thought-out acquisitions. When it comes to investing, I have a fairly decent track record, with bank stocks as the biggest and (I think) most costly exception.

Clearly, I haven't figured out how to correctly analyze bank stocks, so any help you can share with me in order to improve would be most appreciated.

Best regards,
Inside Value Home Fool
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.