No. of Recommendations: 1
Hi Ray,

'cause I said, actually, that a IUL *is* suitable for some people. People who prefer never-declining values over having more money.

That's half-correct. Its for people who prefer to ELIMINATE the catastrophic probabilities of having less money with no further time to recover.

You can see that they both dramatically lower the volatility and drawdowns (losses) of the S&P, and they still have a higher final value than the IUL.

So, is that really your system submission? Buy & hold the S&P (including dividends, for you but not for me, oh of course,) from the stipulated 4/13/1987 date to the final 4/13/2012 date? Unhedged, naked?

Shall I proceed on that submission?

Believe it or not, I am GREATFUL when somebody shows me that I'm wrong about a strategy. 'cause -- look up above -- making more money is good, making less money is bad.

Let's make you very happy & grateful (or even greatful) then! *YOU* can buy the beers when we eventually get the privilege of meeting in person.

Dave Donhoff
Leverage Planner
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.