No. of Recommendations: 15
hocus wrote:
The second biggest flaw is that the study is not statistically valid. Datasnooper (who is famous as this site for exposing the flaws in the "Dogs of the Dow" investing approach recommended in one of the Motley Fool books) has noted that there are not 130 independent data points in the study, but only four (because there are only four 30-year time-periods examined)<snip>

If you are quoting Datasnooper correctly (which I seriously doubt owing to your record here) then datasnooper (and you) are DEAD WRONG!!

With 135 years of data. There are 105 THIRTY YEAR ROLLING PERIODS!!! Each and every one is an INDEPENDANT DATA POINT. Only THIRTY data points are needed to make this a statistically significant study. Intercst has done statistical OVERKILL (by a factor of 3.5) on his statistically significant SWR study.

Hocus, PLEASE stop posting about something you know absolutely NOTHING about (i.e. statistics and simple math). You just make yourself look like an idiot.
Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.